----------------------------
Campaign Updates:
Save Africa's Elephants
The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is an international agreement between 175 Parties (governments). Its aim is to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival. Today, it accords varying degrees of protection to more than 30,000 species of animals and plants, including elephants.
In January 2012 EarthAction asked people everywhere to send a message to their nation’s representative on the CITES ‘Animals Committee’ and ask them to move elephants from their current Appendix II classification, back to the more protected Appendix 1 classification where they were originally placed in 1979. Unfortunately, the Animals Committee didn’t consider the issue of elephants at their March 2012 meeting
This reclassification of elephants to the Appendix I list would ban all new trade in ivory and allow for strict monitoring of the sale and transport of ivory with the expected result being a dramatic decrease in black market trade. Many countries oppose this change. Under their current classification, it is estimated that every year 38,000 elephants are killed for ivory sales on the black market. We must act to make our voices ring louder than theirs and fight to protect Africa's elephants.
The CITES Conference of the Parties (COP), with representatives of all nations that have ratified the treaty, meets every three years. Their next meeting, COP 16, is set for March 2013. The deadline for a nation to submit a proposal for consideration of moving elephants from Appendix II to Appendix I is
4 October 2012.
> Protect Africa's Elephants: Take Action
> Click here to read the summary of the March 2012 meeting of CITES representatives.
> Read the EarthAction alert from February here.
> Read this article to learn more about recent proof that the ivory trade is strong, and taking the lives of a beautiful species with it.
Image Source: Flickr User @Doug88888
----------------------------
Raising Awareness of Global Military Spending

In April, EarthAction supported the second annual Global Day of Action on Military Spending (GDAMS). GDMAS took place on April 17th and the organizers urged participants to focus political, public, and media attention on global military spending.
This year's event saw over 130 actions in 40 countries- all pointing out the human cost of military spending. One of the major events took place in Geneva, Switzerland. The International Peace Bureau organized a seminar at the UN to discuss the human costs of military spending and rising global military spending.
Keep your eyes and ears open for next year's GDAMS to continue reminding politicians, the public, and the media about the lives we could save if military funds were diverted from war and nuclear proliferation.
> Click here to read EarthAction's April action alert on GDAMS.
> Visit demilitarize.org, the official GDAMS website to get information about next year's event and a recap of GDAMS 2012.
|
live webcam sex
sexcams
cam to cam sex
xxx cams
adult webcams
http://livesexcams69.com
adult cams
webcam model
webcam adult
sex webcams
adult webcam chat
Posted by: Mabooggessy | 05/02/2013 at 01:06 PM
The obvious fact that the U.S. is in a recession is going to have people cutting costs in all places. Industries that are not essential, like perfume and other beauty products, will most likely see a drop in sales. Some fragrance companies have already been through several recessions and know how to get through another one. Other, more amateur perfume companies, may take a hit at this time. Which companies are likely to survive, and which ones are at risk during this recession?
There have been several recessions in the U.S. in the last century, causing consumers to cut down on items that are not crucial, like expensive perfume. But some perfume companies have lasted through these times and are now strong enough to stand another recession. These brands are "tried and true." People are not afraid to make a purchase when buying them for a gift or for themselves, because it's a brand that has been around for at least 20 years and they can count on it being a good gain. Some companies that are likely to do well in the recession are common household names like Chanel, Calvin Klein and Elizabeth Arden. Even if somebody wants to buy a perfume as a gift that they have never tried, they would rather buy a perfume from these brands than something that just came out recently.
Celebrity perfumes, for example, are likely to be at risk during times of a recession. Unless they've already tried it and like it, people are less likely to spend on a celebrity endorsed perfume at this time. Just because a perfume has a picture of Justin Beiber on it is not going to be enough to sell during this time. Consumers tend to look at these items as frivolous especially during a recession. Also, most celebrity perfumes like Britney Spears and Mariah Carey are targeted towards teenagers, who will have less money themselves and whose parents will not be buying them extra things like perfume.
History shows that the perfume industry is one of the first to get his during times of a recession. This doesn't mean you have to give up some of your favorite fragrances. During these times you will see lots of perfume brands having huge sales. Stores like Sephora, Macy's or Bloomingdale's, which have large perfume sections, will have perfume sale specials. This is your time to get great deals on perfumes which would otherwise be unaffordable.
http://www.shout-hub.com/SWJDorthy
http://tv.adjgroup.eu/user/view/user/WFEDarlene/uid/31559
http://www.bookmarked.eu/benutzer/358321/lesezeichen/
http://www.kyabola.com/profile/42220/ShelliMixo
http://youxclip.com/RobertaCh
http://abroad-study.livejournal.com/31804.html?mode=reply
http://www.capability.ca/about-us/our-consultants/jacquie-hermann-keller
http://www.allesvoordefotostudio.nl/statieven.html?mode=list&price=1%252C100
http://deblewis.ca/debblog/?p=5393
http://carlosbaradello.com/2012/09/18/is-entrepreneurship-unethical-illegal-or-immoral/
Posted by: Haiquesuscush | 08/21/2013 at 07:16 PM